<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>318 Tech Journal &#187; 10 gigabit ethernet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techjournal.318.com/tag/10-gigabit-ethernet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techjournal.318.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:09:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>10, 40, 100 and 1,000 Gigabit Ethernet</title>
		<link>http://techjournal.318.com/network-architecture/10-40-100-and-1000-gigabit-ethernet/</link>
		<comments>http://techjournal.318.com/network-architecture/10-40-100-and-1000-gigabit-ethernet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Edge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 gigabit ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100 gigabit ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40 gigabit ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terabit ethernet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.318.com/techjournal/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Metcalfe should be proud.  from 3 whole megabits at inception in 1973, ethernet has gone to 10 megabits then 100 and to the desktop is currently sitting at predominantly gigabit speeds.  But in the data center, a push towards 10 gigabit ethernet deployments has been going on since 2002.  One of our favorite products [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Metcalfe should be proud.  from 3 whole megabits at inception in 1973, ethernet has gone to 10 megabits then 100 and to the desktop is currently sitting at predominantly gigabit speeds.  But in the data center, a push towards <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10_gigabit_Ethernet">10 gigabit ethernet</a> deployments has been going on since 2002.  One of our favorite products is the Cisco Catalyst 4948, which has two 10 gigabit ports and 48 gigabit ports, allowing for a couple of servers at 10 gigabit or stacking as a core switch in a medium sized organization.</p>
<p>Of course, as an industry addicted to speed, 10 gigabit ethernet simply isn&#8217;t going to be enough; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_Gigabit_Ethernet">40 gigabit and 100 gigabit ethernet</a> products are already being announced, although primarily in stacking switching fabrics together.  While the standard for 40 gigabit network has not exactly been ratified, we&#8217;ve been seeing a number of products coming out onto the market and standardization by the IEEE is expected in 2010 for 40 and possibly 100 gigabit networking.</p>
<p>The barrier from 100 and is expected to take a little less time than the 7 to 8 year window between when 10 gigabit was released and an expected 40/100 gigabit ethernet.  Terabit networking is expected by 2015, which means that those 10, 40 and 100 gigabit interfaces will not be outdated all that quickly, providing a nice return on the investment.</p>
<p>Overall, 10 gigabit and up can be fairly costly (although with a 40 gigabit release, expect 10 gigabit products to come down in price a bit).  However, it can increase the performance of a network environment exponentially when used in the proper locations and with a comprehensive strategy in place.  318 has experience with 10+ gigabit networking and can help in devising such a strategy.  Feel free to contact us and we will be happy to review options and potential uses for your organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techjournal.318.com/network-architecture/10-40-100-and-1000-gigabit-ethernet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

